Related%20passage for Bava Batra 151:4

ספינה במשיכה היינו תנא קמא אלא דרב ושמואל איכא בינייהו לא דכולי עלמא אי כרב אי כשמואל ובספינה כולי עלמא לא פליגי

[Is not the statement of R. Nathan], 'a ship [is acquired] by <i>meshikah</i>', identical with that of the first Tanna?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why then should R. Nathan make his statement at all? ');">⁷</span> [May we not then conclude that] they differ on the same principles as Rab and Samuel?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first Tanna, like Samuel, requires full meshikah, viz., pulling the entire ship into a new position. R. Nathan, on the other hand, who obviously disputes this requirement, maintains, like Rab, that a slight pull is sufficient. ');">⁸</span>

Explore related%20passage for Bava Batra 151:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.